Ariodante Fabretti Foundation Via E. De Sonnaz 13 - 10121 Torino (Italia) Tel. 011-547005 Fax 011-547019 | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
E-mail: fabretti@arpnet.it | ||||||||||||
1999 The
Farewell Scene - Death and Funerary Rites Report Traditional funeral
rites have entered a general crisis that is being detected by more and more
people every day. In what terms can this crisis be outlined? And what are its
possible solutions? These were the questions tackled by the international
meeting organized by the Fabretti Foundation and held in Turin on the 28th
and 29th of
September 1999 with the title: La scena degli addii. Morte e riti
funebri nella società occidentale contemporanea (The Farewell Scene -
Death and Funerary Rites in the contemporary Western Society). The topic of
funeral rites was approached on an interdisciplinary basis, in order to take
into consideration the different aspects of a problem that has become more and
more complex in contemporary Western societies. In fact, our society has
progressively lost its ties with tradition and has become a multicultural and
multiethnic one, but nonetheless it still shows a primary need for words to
face death with. Perhaps the most
interesting outcomes of this work are the great homogeneity of the conclusions
reached, after a thorough analysis of the present situation, by sociologists,
anthropologists, psychologists, historians and philosophers, on the basis of
their different disciplines, and the identification of some key-points
resulting from the whole of the reports. The actual crisis of the
Catholic funeral rite, for example, was tackled from different points of view.
Sociologists tend to relate it to the decreasing number of those who, in our
contemporary society, keep seeing death
as a passage and who therefore believe in the immortality of the soul, and,
furthermore, to the fact that the traditional social structures that used to
sustain and give sense to that rite have lost their significance (Luigi
Berzano). From a psychological point of view, the religious funeral, although
still widely chosen, is loosing its efficacy in helping to elaborate one’s
mourning, as it interprets the gratuitous violence of death as the sacrifice
of a scapegoat and, furthermore, it suggests and demands the acceptance of
such a sacrifice. The logic of sacrifice is nowadays almost totally absent in
the medical practice and this is why the Christian rite is seen as useless, as
are all rites based on the symbolic exchange theorized by Baudrillard. Today, the meaning of a
funeral rite is no longer to be found in an exchange, in a reciprocity between
the living and the dead, but in an elaboration of mourning based on unselfish
love. A love capable – using a
concept taken from Lévinas’ thought – of taking upon itself the
‘responsibility’ for the dead, that is to continue life, to remember and
to tell in the name of the dead (Francesco Campione). Memory, seen as a kind
of earthly immortality, as a sense of continuity in the mind of the living,
was the main point in many of the reports that focused on the actual range of
the new rites while auspicating future ones. But what do we mean by
memory? Should it be a public memory – in the sense that institutions
actually organize the rites as in Ancient Greece – or should it be
considered as a private remembrance of the beloved ones? At the roots of the
Western civilization the dichotomy public/private rite is clearly showed in
Sophocles’ Antigone (Adriana
Cavarero): Creon, a character who embodies the polis
in this tragedy, represents the political organization of memory, culminating
in a public funeral oration meant to underline the belonging of the citizen to
his town. In Classical Greece, the citizen wasn’t seen as psyché (soul), but as a physical body: his individuality was linked
to his body, which fights and dies for the polis
and by it is celebrated. On the other side, Antigone, Creon’s antagonist,
who symbolically buries his brother, branded as an enemy to the city,
represents the female element, which, for its non-political nature, is seen as
“tremendous” and related to the concept of animality. An animality which
that specific civilization – that is to say the polis
– considers itself freed from. Antigone’s death will not be remembered and
it’s a symbol of the solitude of the dying, deprived of the memory and of
the pietas by their own town. At the
very roots of our civilization man was therefore considered as a political
animal and the community as bearer and guarantor of its citizens’ memory. However, this doesn’t
seem to be the trend emerging from the new ritual forms that have recently
arisen in Europe as an alternative to traditional funeral rites. We should
therefore remark that –according to the interpretations that insist on the
predominance of individualism and that of a private, even “tribal”,
dimension of the funeral rite in our society – there is a tendency to a
“privatization” of the funeral rite. During the meeting, many examples of
this trend in our society were produced. Individuals, relatives, the dying
themselves – often advised by a professional funeral operator – tend to
become the real organizers of the rite in the Dutch lay ritual and in the
syncretistic forms of the rite as celebrated by the various ethnic communities
living in the Netherlands (Marinus Schouten). The same trend can be seen in
the American gay communities suffering from AIDS (Luigi Berzano). In Great
Britain there has recently been an extremely fast increase of the number of
cremations, often followed by the dispersion of the ashes. All these examples
can be easily read as a more and more individualistic attitude towards memory
(Douglas Davies). Sociologist Maffesoli, even more explicitly, thinks that the
political community and its institutions, shouldn’t participate in the rites
organization, so as to allow private initiatives to emerge. In a post-modern
conception of the world, cremation – seen as an accelerated process of
reuniting man to the universe – becomes a symbol of a “tragic” attitude
of the post-modern man, who, identifying himself with contingency, accepts
death and renounces to dominate nature and to look at the future.
However, not everybody
agrees with this post-modern interpretation of our society. Sociologist
Alfredo Milanaccio would rather speak of a late-modern society, and he refers
to the prevailing concept of the body in contemporary Western societies as a
symptom of a substantial continuity with the modern tradition, in which
philosophical and clinical theories have always approached the body as an
object as opposed to a subject, as a machine (Descartes), and even as a mere
corpse (we are referring to Vesalio’s famous treatise on anatomy, 1543).
Today, the concept of body otherness is changing – due to the development of
bio-medical knowledge and to its social power – even if the body is still
seen as “other” as regards the subject. The body is considered as
something un-finished, an intimate project to be carried out by the subject
who has the whole responsibility of it. How does this idea of
the body as a private project behave when faced with death? The physical
decomposition – unavoidable defeat in an individual project for the body
aspiring to immortality – (Paola Borgogna), is kept in the background, and
with it the dead himself. The funeral rite tends to become, according to
English sociologist Tony Walter, a moment of
consolation for the mouning ones. Such a rite, oblivious of the body,
of the dead, of the soul, and, all things considered, of the person, is
extremely poor. Considering this actual trend, we can’t but auspicate a new
rite celebrating the life of the dead. In some cases, the
request for such a new celebration becomes a public affair, or, at least,
begins to involve the public administrations of many European towns. In Bologna, some
women’s associations have tried (with not so great results, so far) to be
given by the local administration the use of adequate premises in order to
celebrate lay funeral rites – just as a lay wedding rite is already provided
for – with the aim of preventing the silencing of the non-believers and
their sadness deriving from not having their own rite. The municipal government of Marseille has entrusted artist Michelangelo Pistoletto with the project for non-confessional, or multi-confessional, premises in which all members of a community could celebrate their funeral rites as well as other rites (Michelangelo Pistoletto, Corinne Diserens). |